The ever-growing popularity of computer science has fostered the need for computational thinking (CT), especially in K-12 education. Pedagogy that infuses CT, as well as reliable methods for assessing CT, remain open areas of research. This paper will describe a STEM outreach program where the __anonymized__ school district has partnered with __anonymized__ university. This program lasts four weeks and is designed to expose STEM subjects and careers to 5th-9th grade students through hands-on activities. The program covers a large range of areas, including robotics, computer programming, agriculture, food science, unmanned aerial vehicles, clean energy, and construction science. Educators, who are experts in the particular subject matter, are paired with small groups (2-4) of pre-service teachers to run each class (maximum size of 18). This allows pre-service teachers to get practical, hands-on experience, as well as to learn new STEM activities to include in their own future classrooms. This also gives an excellent teacher to student ratio, providing a one-on-one learning experience for program participants.
As part of the STEM program, we developed two interventions. The Saving the Martian (Mars) class was an intervention focused on 5th and 6th grade students and introduced CT using the Scratch programming environment. Many of the activities were modeled on situations or ideas taken from The Martian, by Andy Weir, to make them more interesting and exciting for the students. The Mighty Micro Controllers (MMC) class was an intervention for 7th-9th graders focused on teaching CT through programming Arduino Uno micro controllers using Scratch, as well as a small exposure to the Arduino IDE and text-based language. Overall, the format of this class included guided examples on how to create certain circuits and programs, followed by problem driven exploration to help enforce programming, electrical, and CT skills.
In order to measure student performance, we developed a self-efficacy survey (five point Likert scale) to collect attitudes towards students’ ability to think computationally and their problem solving skills. Our experiment was carried out in a pre-post survey format. Out of 110 students between both interventions, one student was excluded for opting out of the survey, one student was excluded for missing the pre-survey, and three students were excluded for having incomplete responses. A Chronbach’s Alpha of .872 on the pre-survey and .908 on the post-survey shows that our survey was reliable. The results of the pre- and post-surveys will be discussed in relation to the following goals: 1. Are the developed curricula effective at improving student self-efficacy in CT? 2. Is our survey a reliable and effective way of measuring student self-efficacy in CT? 3. Illustrate that CT is not the same as problem solving, but a component of cognition.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.