Enhancing STEM Education at Oregon State University – Year 2
Development and implementation of innovative instructional practices are currently underway in courses in many STEM programs at Oregon State University (OSU). Not surprisingly, they tend to be largely sequestered within a discipline, target different, specific elements, and are at varying stages of implementation. However OSU is witnessing elements of transdisciplinary collaboration emerging. The ESTEME@OSU Program presents an opportunity to catalyze broad institutional change through scaling and cross-pollination of efforts utilizing two evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs), interactive engagement with frequent formative feedback and formal cooperative learning, in targeted classes in five STEM departments (biology, chemistry, engineering, mathematics, and physics). Project EBIPs are based on an interactive lecture environment combined with a studio workshop-based cooperative recitation environment; targeted outcomes are students’ well-connected conceptual knowledge structures and abilities to non-linearly and iteratively solve problems utilizing conceptual understanding. The courses we have initially selected for implementation of EBIPs are the calculus-based introductory courses. Normalizing effort across these courses ensures that there will be opportunities for students to have multiple synergistic experiences (especially in years 1 and 2) early in demanding STEM majors.
Our efforts are based on a strategic interaction of socio-cultural and cognitive theories of organizational change (communities of practice, social capital and diffusion of innovations, organizational learning), impacts on individual learning (conceptual change regarding cognitive schemas, motivation, self-efficacy, social resources), and evidence based instructional practices (interactive engagement, frequent formative feedback, and formal cooperative learning).
We use communities of practice (CoP) as the primary mechanism for implementation and scaling of EBIPs. CoPs will be directed towards two areas (i) curricular development and (ii) instructional practice. In the first area, CoPs allow faculty who have been independently developing and implementing similar innovative instructional practices to regularize across departments. This activity supports further development – allowing innovators to borrow from one another and to collectively address problems they cannot solve independently. In the second area, CoPs permit faculty and student instructors to explicitly address and negotiate an essential tension: developing one’s skill in instruction requires an educator to deepen her/his understanding and metacognition concerning what she/he is teaching (disciplinary content) and how she/he is teaching it (instructional strategies). In both these areas, the CoPs facilitate evolving relationships amongst members developed around things that matter. Our approach is based on the premise that in the inclusion of three interacting elements - (i) using community-agreed upon EBIPs; (ii) while working to increase scale, and (iii) learning about what other units are doing and how they are doing it through CoPs - we have components for emergent organizational change.
This poster presentation reports on Year 2 of this project.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.